Today’s post is from special guest star Anne Walker. Anne majored in Fine Arts with a focus in painting at Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT in 1989. She started taking classes at the League a couple of years ago. I met her in Fran’s Giant Figures workshop in February 2020 (shortly before our classes went online). I admire Anne’s artwork, as well as her philosophies about art making. She and I have been talking a lot about Cezanne lately, and on a lark, Anne decided to see his show of drawings at MoMA. She sent her thoughts about the show via email, and I appreciated her thoughts so much I asked if I could share her letter. Below is a personal artist’s tour of the Cezanne Drawing show at MoMA.
Postcard from Anne Walker
I just returned from the Cezanne drawing show at MoMA (through Sept 25). The reviewers rave about the show – and they are right. It is revelatory to see the drawings. When you see the full range of drawings across 50 years, it becomes clear that as much as Cezanne was a revolutionary – he was a classicist. He straddled generations.
After Puget: Hercules Resting C. 1894-97, Pencil on wove paper 8 3/16 x 4 15/16″ (20.8 x 12.5 cm)
Cezanne studied classical sculpture, and a few favorite painters- like Delacroix, his whole life. He had plaster copies of classical sculpture – like the Cupid by Pierre Puget (a sculptor I didn’t know) – kicking around his studio. Cezanne drew those objects again and again. He studied how forms (and shapes within a form) connect. He followed the shapes of foot to calf to thigh up the torso through the arm, creating undulating rhythmic volumes. Connected shapes that carry your eye around the picture.
Studies After the Cupid Attributed to Puget 1875-1890 Pencil on paper (some wove, some laid) various sizes
Here’s something else I think Cezanne got from studying sculpture. In his drawings the foot, the elbow, the hand on a stump will often have an open/broken outline connecting the object to the background – much like how a Michelangelo figure melts into the marble block it’s carved from. Cezanne consistently leaves some part of the edges of objects open so the form never disconnects from the background.
Seated Peasant, c. 1900 (possibly later) Watercolor on Paper, 18 1/16 x 12 3/16″ (45.8 x 31 cm)
Something I didn’t understand until I saw the drawings and the watercolors – Cezanne was extremely aware of the paper. The lines and bits of shadow serve to sculpt the paper and give it substance and volume. The untouched paper becomes light, space and form connecting and undulating across the surface. Cezanne isn’t just placing dabs of color to represent shadow or drawing multiple lines just because he shifted perspective. He is using line and color to carve paper into substance. He said, (highly paraphrased) that the center of an object is the focus and the area closest to the eye is left white, with all the lines pushing the center forward. This is harder to see in the paintings, easier to see in the drawings.
Three Pears 1888-90 Pencil and watercolor on laid paper 9 1/2 x 12 3/16″ (24.2 x 31 cm)
Cezanne studied same things again and again from different angles. It was a lifetime study of how forms connect and resonate, striving for harmony/balance. He described studying nature as the ultimate study because of its complexity of forms and the challenge of capturing both the sensation of the experience and the search for structure. By the time he was making his great landscapes later in life, you can see the influence of decades of studying the classical figure.
The Chateau Noir with Mont Sainte-Victoire 1890-95 Watercolor and pencil on laid paper 12 3/16 x 19″ (31 x 48.3 cm)
Another highlight of the show are the casual notebook sketches. Cezanne let fragments of objects collide and combine in imaginative ways that look absolutely contemporary and fresh.
After Delacroix: Wild Animal, and Figure in Motion 1865-68 Crayon on wove paper 7 1/16 x 9 7/16″ (18x 42.1 cm)
I’ll leave you with a fun fact. The Three Pears (a stunning watercolor) was shown at auction. Degas and Renoir argued over who got the piece and decided to draw lots. Degas won.
Three Pears 1888-90 Pencil and watercolor on laid paper 9 1/2 x 12 3/16″ (24.2 x 31 cm)
Plaster Cupid c. 1900 Pencil and watercolor on paper 24 13.16 x 19 5/16″ (63 x 49 cm)
After Puget: Milo of Crotona, c. 1890. Pencil on laid paper, 18 13/16 x 12 3/8″ (47.8 x 31.4 cm)
Studies after Passarotti, Domenichino, and an Unknnown Master 1867-70 Pencil on wove paper 7 1/16 x 9 1/2″ (18 x 24 cm)
Study of a Head and Hands 1867-69 Charcoal on laid paper 12 3/8 x 19 5/16″ (31.5 x 49 cm)
Head of Woman Sleeping and Figure Sketch after Michelangelo c.1875-79 Pencil on wove paper 8 7/16-4 7/8″ (21.5 x 12.4cm)
After Delacroix: Wild Animal, and Figure in Motion 1865-68 Crayon on wove paper 7 1/16 x 9 7/16″ (18x 42.1 cm)
The Chateau Noir with Mont Sainte-Victoire 1890-95 Watercolor and pencil on laid paper 12 3/16 x 19″ (31 x 48.3 cm)
Study of Houses: Street at Aix c. 1892-94 Pencil and watercolor on paper 18 1/2 x 12 1/8″ (47 x 30.8 cm)
Seated Peasant, c. 1900 (possibly later) Watercolor on Paper, 18 1/16 x 12 3/16″ (45.8 x 31 cm)
The Bridge at Gardanne. c. 1885-86 Watercolor and laid paper 8 1/8 x 12 1/4″ ( 20.6 x 31.1 cm)
Female Bathers 1900-06 Pencil and watercolor on laid paper with strip added at left 6 11/16 x 10 5/8″ (17×27 cm)
In the Forest 1895-98 Pencil and watercolor on paper 18 7/8 x 12 3/16″ (48 x 31cm)
Bathers 1885-90 Watercolor and pencil on wove paper 5 x 8 1/8″ (12.7 x 20.6 cm)
Landscape with Boulders and Trees c. 1890-94 Pencil on wove paper 8 1/4 x 10 1/8″ (21 x 25.7 cm)
Mont Sainte- Victoire c.1904 Oil on canvas 21 1/4 x 25 9/16″ (54 x 65 cm)
Group of Male Bathers c.1880 Pencil and watercolor on wove paper 4 5/8 x 7 3/4″ (11.8 x 19.7 cm)
Rocks and Trees near the Chateau Noir 1900-04 Pencil and watercolor on paper 21 34 x 16 3/4 ” (55.3 x 42.6 cm)
A lot of people have been joining our Drawing A Day challenge. While most people prefer to keep their drawings private, a few brave and fabulous people have been posting their drawings to Facebook and Instagram, tagging them #seattleartleague and #drawingaday so we can all enjoy them. Below are few of my favorites posted by friends of the …
You are 2/3 the way through our 30 Day Challenge. To see what you missed in the past 19 days, click here. Today we have transcription challenge. For this, make something inspired by Winslow Homer’s “The Herring Net” (oil on canvas 30 1/8 × 48 3/8 in). What’s a transcription? In art, to transcribe is to copy or …
This creative challenge is different from a lot of other challenges out there. Designed to foster a wide variety of artists, these prompts are aimed at an unusually wide variety of creative skills. I’ve categorized prompts by type, so you can enjoy the things that come naturally to you, and strengthen the things that don’t. …
If a painting is said to be realistic it’s usually said to be “photorealistic” and this is meant to be a compliment. While I think realism is a valid description of style, photorealism is something else to me completely. The first problem is that “photorealism” assumes that images from a camera are realistic, but cameras hardly ever capture …
Postcard from Cezanne’s show at MoMA
Today’s post is from special guest star Anne Walker. Anne majored in Fine Arts with a focus in painting at Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT in 1989. She started taking classes at the League a couple of years ago. I met her in Fran’s Giant Figures workshop in February 2020 (shortly before our classes went online). I admire Anne’s artwork, as well as her philosophies about art making. She and I have been talking a lot about Cezanne lately, and on a lark, Anne decided to see his show of drawings at MoMA. She sent her thoughts about the show via email, and I appreciated her thoughts so much I asked if I could share her letter. Below is a personal artist’s tour of the Cezanne Drawing show at MoMA.
Postcard from Anne Walker
I just returned from the Cezanne drawing show at MoMA (through Sept 25). The reviewers rave about the show – and they are right. It is revelatory to see the drawings. When you see the full range of drawings across 50 years, it becomes clear that as much as Cezanne was a revolutionary – he was a classicist. He straddled generations.
C. 1894-97,
Pencil on wove paper
8 3/16 x 4 15/16″ (20.8 x 12.5 cm)
Cezanne studied classical sculpture, and a few favorite painters- like Delacroix, his whole life. He had plaster copies of classical sculpture – like the Cupid by Pierre Puget (a sculptor I didn’t know) – kicking around his studio. Cezanne drew those objects again and again. He studied how forms (and shapes within a form) connect. He followed the shapes of foot to calf to thigh up the torso through the arm, creating undulating rhythmic volumes. Connected shapes that carry your eye around the picture.
1875-1890
Pencil on paper (some wove, some laid)
various sizes
Here’s something else I think Cezanne got from studying sculpture. In his drawings the foot, the elbow, the hand on a stump will often have an open/broken outline connecting the object to the background – much like how a Michelangelo figure melts into the marble block it’s carved from. Cezanne consistently leaves some part of the edges of objects open so the form never disconnects from the background.
c. 1900 (possibly later)
Watercolor on Paper,
18 1/16 x 12 3/16″ (45.8 x 31 cm)
Something I didn’t understand until I saw the drawings and the watercolors – Cezanne was extremely aware of the paper. The lines and bits of shadow serve to sculpt the paper and give it substance and volume. The untouched paper becomes light, space and form connecting and undulating across the surface. Cezanne isn’t just placing dabs of color to represent shadow or drawing multiple lines just because he shifted perspective. He is using line and color to carve paper into substance. He said, (highly paraphrased) that the center of an object is the focus and the area closest to the eye is left white, with all the lines pushing the center forward. This is harder to see in the paintings, easier to see in the drawings.
1888-90
Pencil and watercolor on laid paper
9 1/2 x 12 3/16″ (24.2 x 31 cm)
Cezanne studied same things again and again from different angles. It was a lifetime study of how forms connect and resonate, striving for harmony/balance. He described studying nature as the ultimate study because of its complexity of forms and the challenge of capturing both the sensation of the experience and the search for structure. By the time he was making his great landscapes later in life, you can see the influence of decades of studying the classical figure.
1890-95
Watercolor and pencil on laid paper
12 3/16 x 19″ (31 x 48.3 cm)
Another highlight of the show are the casual notebook sketches. Cezanne let fragments of objects collide and combine in imaginative ways that look absolutely contemporary and fresh.
1865-68
Crayon on wove paper
7 1/16 x 9 7/16″ (18x 42.1 cm)
I’ll leave you with a fun fact. The Three Pears (a stunning watercolor) was shown at auction. Degas and Renoir argued over who got the piece and decided to draw lots. Degas won.
Related Posts
Best of Drawing A Day, Week 1
A lot of people have been joining our Drawing A Day challenge. While most people prefer to keep their drawings private, a few brave and fabulous people have been posting their drawings to Facebook and Instagram, tagging them #seattleartleague and #drawingaday so we can all enjoy them. Below are few of my favorites posted by friends of the …
Day 20: The Herring Net #30SAL
You are 2/3 the way through our 30 Day Challenge. To see what you missed in the past 19 days, click here. Today we have transcription challenge. For this, make something inspired by Winslow Homer’s “The Herring Net” (oil on canvas 30 1/8 × 48 3/8 in). What’s a transcription? In art, to transcribe is to copy or …
30SAL Challenge: Emoji
This creative challenge is different from a lot of other challenges out there. Designed to foster a wide variety of artists, these prompts are aimed at an unusually wide variety of creative skills. I’ve categorized prompts by type, so you can enjoy the things that come naturally to you, and strengthen the things that don’t. …
Why I object to the term “photorealism”
If a painting is said to be realistic it’s usually said to be “photorealistic” and this is meant to be a compliment. While I think realism is a valid description of style, photorealism is something else to me completely. The first problem is that “photorealism” assumes that images from a camera are realistic, but cameras hardly ever capture …