In the preface, NPR’s always-brilliant media pundit Brooke Gladstone writes:
We media consumers are far too jaded by national politics to be influenced by campaign posters, right? We all know that posters are blatant manipulations, intended not to inform but to enlist. They emphasize faces and catchphrases. They condense complicated issues into jagged little pills. They are blunt instruments.
At the same time, the most effective campaign posters of every era leave as much as possible to the voter’s imagination. They are like Japanese manga: the less detailed the image, the more easily we can identify with the candidate, the more space for projecting our dreams. The more specific the image, the greater the risk of creating a feeling of “otherness,” which translates into death at the polls.
What emerges is a quilt-portrait of politics itself, stitched together by a common thread of propaganda techniques and the underlying ideological necessities they bespeak, unchanging across the ages — all the more striking given many of these posters come from an age predating marketing as we know it and what Gladstone calls the “now never-ending research into the psychology of primary colors, the semiotics of sans serif, and the syntactics of the sound bite.”
1856: James Buchanan (Democrat) v. James Fremont (Republican) v. Millard Fillmore (American)1860: Abraham Lincoln (Republican) v. Stephen Douglas (Democrat) v. John C. Breckinridge (Southern Democrat) v. John Bell (Constitutional Union)1864: Abraham Lincoln (Republican) v. George B. McClellan (Democrat)1872: Ulysses S. Grant (Republican) v. Horace Greeley (Liberal Republican)
Gladstone observes:
The ultimate lesson of this collection is how choppy those waters are. Political art is nothing less than an illustration of the skirmishes and stalemates that created and continue to animate the American experiment. As you look at each poster and read about each campaign, it becomes increasingly clear that the tug of war over taxes and trade, the distribution of wealth and power, and the role of government itself, will never end.
Every generation renews the battle and fights it again. And every time, political candidates borrow from past campaigns the lexicon of perpetual political war. It reverberates in the slogans and the speeches, the urgent need: for tax relief or social protections, for an active government or a dormant one, for war or peace, to stay the course or to change direction.
1908: William H. Taft (Republican) v. William J. Bryan (Democrat) v. Eugene V. Debs (Socialist)1924: Calvin Coolidge (Republican) v. John Davis (Democrat) v. Robert La Follette (Progressive)1928: Herbert Hoover (Republican) v. Al Smith (Democrat)1948: Harry S. Truman (Democrat) v. Thomas E. Dewey (Republican) v. J. Strom Thurmond (States’ Rights Democrat) v. Henry A. Wallace (Progressive)1968: Richard M. Nixon (Republican) v. Hubert Humphrey (Democrat) v. George Wallace (Independent)1968: Richard M. Nixon (Republican) v. Hubert Humphrey (Democrat) v. George Wallace (Independent)1968: Richard M. Nixon (Republican) v. Hubert Humphrey (Democrat) v. George Wallace (Independent)1968: Richard M. Nixon (Republican) v. Hubert Humphrey (Democrat) v. George Wallace (Independent)1972: Richard M. Nixon (Republican) v. George McGovern (Democrat)1980: Ronald Reagan (Republican) v. Jimmy Carter (Democrat) v. John Anderson (Independent)1980: Ronald Reagan (Republican) v. Jimmy Carter (Democrat) v. John Anderson (Independent)1988: George H. W. Bush (Republican) v. Michael Dukakis (Democrat)2008: Barack Obama (Democrat) v. John McCain (Republican)2008: Barack Obama (Democrat) v. John McCain (Republican)
At once a time-capsule of history and an invaluable timeline of design evolution,Presidential Campaign Posters offers a rare look at the craftsmanship of political propaganda and the abiding aspects of the human condition that it bespeaks.
Welcome to the 9th day of our 30 Day Challenge. I’ve pretty much decided that the more serious the news is, the less serious these challenges are going to be. Saturdays are experimental days, so instead of reaching for our paints, we’re going to play with our food. Prepare to get silly in the kitchen. …
Washing a brush seems simple enough: Step 1. Get the paint out Step 2. Congratulate yourself on your success. Obvious, no? I was years out of art school, and I had ruined several hundreds of dollars of brushes before I learned how to properly care for my tools. Below are two simple videos on brush care. …
François-Antoine Bossuet, (1798 – 1889) Belgian Would you like your drawings and paintings to be suggestive but not bound to too much detail? Take my Cityscapes Workshop May 11/12.
[image_with_animation image_url=”7866″ alignment=”center” animation=”None” box_shadow=”none” max_width=”100%”] Connectivity Report, System 1 New work by Claire Putney Watercolor, burned maps and text on paper Don’t miss this show, Leaguers! Reception 1st Thursday, Feb 1, 5:00-9:00 Showing through February CORE Gallery 117 Prefontaine Pl S, Seattle, WA 98104 https://www.coregallery.org/ Do you like these unusual effects? Claire Putney is …
A Visual History of Presidential Campaign Posters: 200 Years of Election Art from the Library of Congress Archives
A brief visual history of political propaganda design.
BY MARIA POPOVA
Original post from BrainPickings
In the preface, NPR’s always-brilliant media pundit Brooke Gladstone writes:
What emerges is a quilt-portrait of politics itself, stitched together by a common thread of propaganda techniques and the underlying ideological necessities they bespeak, unchanging across the ages — all the more striking given many of these posters come from an age predating marketing as we know it and what Gladstone calls the “now never-ending research into the psychology of primary colors, the semiotics of sans serif, and the syntactics of the sound bite.”
Gladstone observes:
At once a time-capsule of history and an invaluable timeline of design evolution,Presidential Campaign Posters offers a rare look at the craftsmanship of political propaganda and the abiding aspects of the human condition that it bespeaks.
Related Posts
30SAL Challenge: Masterfork
Welcome to the 9th day of our 30 Day Challenge. I’ve pretty much decided that the more serious the news is, the less serious these challenges are going to be. Saturdays are experimental days, so instead of reaching for our paints, we’re going to play with our food. Prepare to get silly in the kitchen. …
How to Wash a Brush
Washing a brush seems simple enough: Step 1. Get the paint out Step 2. Congratulate yourself on your success. Obvious, no? I was years out of art school, and I had ruined several hundreds of dollars of brushes before I learned how to properly care for my tools. Below are two simple videos on brush care. …
Some dumb bricks by François-Antoine Bossuet
François-Antoine Bossuet, (1798 – 1889) Belgian Would you like your drawings and paintings to be suggestive but not bound to too much detail? Take my Cityscapes Workshop May 11/12.
Claire Putney’s new drawings at CORE
[image_with_animation image_url=”7866″ alignment=”center” animation=”None” box_shadow=”none” max_width=”100%”] Connectivity Report, System 1 New work by Claire Putney Watercolor, burned maps and text on paper Don’t miss this show, Leaguers! Reception 1st Thursday, Feb 1, 5:00-9:00 Showing through February CORE Gallery 117 Prefontaine Pl S, Seattle, WA 98104 https://www.coregallery.org/ Do you like these unusual effects? Claire Putney is …